Files
life-echo/api/.agents/skills/redis-development/rules/stream-choosing-pattern.md
Sully 53e0065e3e refactor(api): TOML 配置 SSOT、统一错误契约、Auth/事务加固与可观测性 (#33)
配置 SSOT(TOML + .env)
统一错误契约
Auth 与事务边界
Redis / Celery 可靠性:业务 Redis(DB/0)与 Celery broker/backend(DB/1)显式拆分;连接池、sync client
可观测性(OpenTelemetry + LGTM)
2026-05-22 13:44:50 +08:00

45 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown

---
title: Choose Streams vs Pub/Sub Appropriately
impact: MEDIUM
impactDescription: Wrong choice leads to lost messages or unnecessary complexity
tags: streams, pubsub, messaging, events, queues
description: Choose Streams vs Pub/Sub Appropriately
alwaysApply: true
---
## Choose Streams vs Pub/Sub Appropriately
Redis supports two messaging approaches for different use cases.
**Incorrect:** Using Pub/Sub when messages must not be lost.
```python
# Pub/Sub - messages lost if no subscribers connected
r.publish("orders", json.dumps(order)) # Fire and forget!
```
**Correct:** Use Streams when message durability matters.
```python
# Streams - messages persist and can be replayed
r.xadd("orders:stream", {"order": json.dumps(order)})
# Consumer group for reliable processing
r.xreadgroup("workers", "worker-1", {"orders:stream": ">"}, count=10)
r.xack("orders:stream", "workers", message_id)
```
### When to Use Each
| Requirement | Use |
|-------------|-----|
| Real-time notifications, OK to miss messages | Pub/Sub |
| Messages must not be lost | Streams |
| Need to replay/reprocess messages | Streams |
| Multiple workers processing same queue | Streams (consumer groups) |
| Simple broadcast to connected clients | Pub/Sub |
| Event sourcing or audit trail | Streams |
Reference: [Redis Streams](https://redis.io/docs/latest/develop/data-types/streams/)